In the beginning, our challenge was to understand the establishment of real property rights. That has been accomplished. We have learned that the rights to land and its incidents were established through patented grants of land. We have learned that the rights so granted via sealed Letters Patent ran with the land, regardless of who owned all or any portion of the original grant. And we learned that obligations of land granted in fee simple were also established through these Letters Patent as issued with the original alienation from the Crown. So, we came to understand that there were limitations to our granted rights. The rights granted could only be given up to others by the owner of the land. Once given up, they may never be returned to the owner, but that was to be an informed choice made by the landowner. However, knowing our rights brought on new challenges. How can the rights of the landowner be ignored in our courts? How can any level of government ignore the prerogative of the Sovereign? Our municipal governments, our provincial governments, our federal government and our courts have sworn oaths to uphold the Constitution and defend the honour of the Sovereign, but are they really doing that? The difficulty for the governing bodies and the courts is that they have strayed so far from the intent of the patented land grants that they may not see an easy road back. They must decide whether they will abide by the Constitution and uphold the laws that support our rights of ownership. We are presenting the facts. So far, those facts are not being acknowledged. That is our challenge!

.

Facts and Frustrations The facts that have gotten us to this point. 1. We have studied extensively land granting, statute, case law, and Constitutional experts. 2. We have sought out, worked with and retained excellent members of the legal community. 3. We have spent tens upon tens of thousands of dollars preparing a case to put before the courts. 4. And we have followed the instruction of the court in asking a Constitutional question. The frustrations have been clear and simple. The courts have not addressed the issues raised and the Attorney’s General for both the province and the dominion, although put on notice, have failed to become involved. Our questions remain unanswered! These are just a few of the questions that must be addressed. Is anyone defending the Honour of our Sovereign? Why are we having to prove the existence, validity and intent of our Letters Patent? Are Imperial matters of record, aka Imperial Letters Patent, granting land and expressing the will of the Sovereign to be upheld as intended? Are the many provincial statutes that support our position to be respected? Our frustration is that no one will answer our questions.